Total Pageviews

Monday, 16 July 2018

(1) A New diverse model, Parole Board made up of the public . (2 ) Now the actual report, described as “one of the most disturbing reports in recent years” has been published and Mr Clarke asks if some of the apparently self-inflicted deaths were caused by prisoners unable to “face life in the violent, drug ridden prison”. (3) Enough is Enough

The maddest idea

Recent newspaper reports have brought us the most surprising news that the MoJ are to consider inviting the public to attend parole hearings. Is the Secretary of State so desperate to save his job that he will do or say anything?
“Since recent public outrage has led to a ban on live animals performing in circuses, it probably makes sense to the Minister to replace the circus ring with Parole Board hearings.”
I don’t even think that a previous Home Secretary, Michael ‘Something of the night’ Howard, once the most harsh and divisive of Home Secretary’s would have considered such a move.
Who would they invite to attend? Probably a number of less than respectable journalists from the gutter-press of the UK. Would they sell tickets? Perhaps there is money to be made from selling souvenirs or even refreshments? Where would they take place? I just cannot imagine prisons being opened up to the public so that they can see the dirty secrets that they unwittingly spend so much of their tax-money on.
But the most urgent question in my mind is why are the Parole Board being held responsible for recent fiascos when it was clearly the fault of the MoJ and the cost-cutting that caused the problems in the first place? The Parole Board should be congratulated for the fantastic work they have been doing for many years.Author - -
 Image result for pictures of the court jury

..........................................................................................



Katherine Gleeson

Parole Board made up of the public .


 I totally understand those who maybe sceptical concerning the public being part of the parole board however I do believe the public should be part of the parole board decisions making. Our existing Parole board I feel tend to be snobbish with comparable education and background,. I would like to see a Modern and diverse Parole board joint with Students, Nurses, and"Senco Teachers those that understand behaviours".

 Your views on the topic Email  katherinegleeson@aol.com


....................................................................................................






In January, the Chief Inspector of Prisons, Peter Clarke, was so disturbed by what he found during an inspection of HMP Nottingham that he made it the first referral to the Justice Secretary under the new ‘Urgent Notification Protocol’. Now the actual report, described as “one of the most disturbing reports in recent years” has been published and Mr Clarke asks if some of the apparently self-inflicted deaths were caused by prisoners unable to “face life in the violent, drug ridden prison”. He says the prison is “defined by the prevalence of drugs and violence”.

Prisons Ombudsman and Inspection report recommendations had not been implemented and cell call bells were still not being responded to quickly. Mr Clarke said: “This prison will not become fit for purpose until it is made safe. It was clear from our evidence that many prisoners at Nottingham did not feel safe.”

Elizabeth Moody, acting Prisons and Probation Ombudsman, said of the report: “The Chief Inspector is right to highlight the apparent inability of the prison to learn lessons and I agree that until it can demonstrate progress in this critical area the risk of future deaths will remain high.”

Inspector  ‘Appalling’ and ‘Tragic’
4.500 incidents of use of force in 6 months with little governance;103 assaults on staff in previous six months; 
Over 50% of prisoners reported bullying and victimisation; 
40% of prisoners felt unsafe on their first night; 
Nearly 50% of prisoners had mental health issues;‘Persistent and fundamental lack of safety.’   

........................................................................................................

 

Problem Solved



‘Champions are here to help solve the problems of prisoners in HMP Wealstun’
At HMP Wealstun, 18 men are trying out a brand-new scheme where prisoners are given training by the Universities of York and Leeds to help their peers gain problem solving skills. The scheme is informed by research which shows that problem solving skills are accessible and can have beneficial impact on their health and well-being. The Problem-Solving Champions deliver problem solving skills to prisoners on the wing or in their place of work. The role of the problem-solving champion is not to resolve the problem, but to show fellow prisoners a systematic approach to deal with their own problems in a proactive manner.
Everyone has problems in prison, for example – limited access to family visits: ‘The problem I have is that I can only see my family for one hour a week. So, I do everything I can to get home asap. I’ve got all the information I need to see if I’m considered for HDC, I’ve weighed up all my pros and cons and I’ve made plans to do every course necessary and set goals to help me see them through. I love my family and I’ll do anything I need to do to get home to them sooner’.

Step one: Define the problem
‘I can only see my family for one hour a week.’

Step two: Stop and think
‘What can I do to occupy my time’? How can I act positively?

Step three: Gather information
Are there courses I can attend? What job could I do? What hobbies do I like? Can I improve my education? How can I find ways to relax?

Step four: Finding solutions
Think of as many different ideas as you can to resolve the problem. Identify courses, what jobs can I do, how do I apply? I enjoy reading and painting; can I go to the library or access a painting course? I would like to improve my computer skills, are there any exercise classes I can attend?

Step five: Weighing up the pros and cons
Write down each solution and then identify the pros and cons. Which solution or solutions to do you prefer?

Step six: Making a plan
Put your preferred solutions into order; decide which you are going to do first. Make a plan – when are you going to do each task? Make a date and time. Do you need help from anyone else?

Step seven: Review your plan
In this step we encourage people to review how their plan worked. Did they manage to action everything? If not, why not? Reviewing the problem helps people to develop their problem-solving skills, and when things have not gone to plan, to assess why and try again.

What do the problem-solving
champions think about the scheme?
l “I see a lot of people with problems struggling around me and when I heard of the scheme (problem solving) I thought it would be good to take part and help the ones who need it that I see every day. As I’ve been there and know how it feels to let your problems build up.”
l “I have learnt that there is nothing wrong with asking others for help if you need it. It’s better to face your problems rather than ignore them. We made plans in my own life and I’ve set myself goals to see them through and stay assertive with a positive attitude to life.”

What do staff at HMP Wealstun think about the scheme?
l “As an Induction Officer, I can see that the Problem-Solving Champion role has had a massively positive effect on the way new arrivals into Wealstun are put at ease and helped through their first few days in the establishment. Problem Solvers are readily available on the wing and easy to spot in their labelled t-shirts in order for new arrivals to approach them.”
l “Induction Officers are often very busy, but the implementation of the Problem Solvers has allowed us more time to do the important work that so often gets left to the last minute while we’re racing around answering questions and settling new prisoners. Staff are, and always will be, a port of call for all prisoners but Problem Solvers are approaching new arrivals and helping them with all manner of things, including where to find applications, how to apply for work and even where to get a toothbrush or toilet roll from – things that are very important to prisoners. The fact that new arrivals no longer have the stress of thinking they’re not being heard can only have a positive effect on stress levels, and ultimately lower the number of ACCT documents being opened.”
l “For the Problem Solvers themselves, the scheme has given them a chance to not only help other prisoners seek methods to resolve their own issues but to use their skills inwardly. This will go a long way to helping them manage life in prison and also on the outside, which I’m sure will have a positive impact on rehabilitation.”

 ...............................................................

IPP knock – back

I have come to the conclusion that the Parole Board is a joke! I have recently received my latest knock- back. I am an IPP prisoner maintaining my genuine innocence and was given a nominal tariff of 1 year and 2 months. I have now been incarcerated since January 2006. Yes, 
that’s correct, 12-years.
I am now 64-years old and I believe that the Parole Board are being influenced by recent events and publicity and erring on the side of caution. It is time the government stepped in and ended this barbaric and inhumane sentence once and for all. After all, it was the government that created it.

“They should convert the remaining IPP sentences to determinate terms. I’m sure that there are many, like me, who are innocent yet still lost in a nightmarish system without hope.”
Perhaps there is a solicitor out there who would take on this challenge? I don’t profess to know the law but it seems to me that when a sentence is passed, the trial judge, being in possession of all the facts, gives a sentence that is correct. Surely it could be argued that being incarcerated 10-years beyond what the trial judge intended makes a sentence become ‘manifestly excessive’? Any thoughts on this? By M D Loxley - HMP Littlehey 2018


Enough is Enough

Ministry of Jokers scratch-card, scratch away the shiny allure of hope and below the surface is mayhem. 

It is with great sadness, yet again, that I am forced to write about the very sad and untimely passing of another young man. He passed away in a cell above mine on the evening of 31st March 2018. He had been suffering real family distress recently which had led to him being in a constant-watch-cell.For reasons that are unfathomable to us here on the wing he was suddenly reduced to just a 15-minute watch on the day he died. It has also become known that he had his medication reduced. Whatever the reasons are, constant watch is constant, not walk away and come back 15-minutes later. With much heartfelt wishes to his family from all the lads here on Alwen A-Lowers and around the prison.

An internal investigation, by the PPO, and likely the local coroner, will now ensue and then a message to say ‘lessons have been learned’ will be disgustingly trotted out. Hundreds of prisoners are losing their lives every year in prisons up and down the country simply because no lessons are EVER learned. The MoJ just doesn’t care if a man, woman, or child dies in their so-called ‘care’. They have a thinking that there’s always someone else to take our place. I’m a middle-aged man now and angered by the sadness I feel at this young man losing his life. I now therefore ask ANY solicitor and counsel to write to me with a view to taking a judicial review v SSJ for corporate manslaughter on a grand scale and misfeasance in a Public Office. The waste of any lives is criminal. 

Why is it that prisoners are the only ones who seem to be outraged by these events? Joe public, it’s high time you and the national press acted.After leaving behind the years of degradation I’d been forced to endure since 2008 in the High-Security estate and ‘B’ Trainer system, I arrived here seven weeks ago. Flagship prison with an ethos to make a difference






View this email in your browser

No progress on existing concerns

Readers are well aware of the ongoing crises in the prison and probation services. Yesterday’s 3rd annual report from the Lay Observers confirmed that court custody and escort services are also in a very poor sate.
The 2017-18 annual report repeats a continuing concern that a system of disconnected contracts and responsibilities for the different elements of services for escort and court custody causes significant failings. The Lay Observers found that the welfare of Detained Persons is at risk due to poor communication, delays in the provision of appropriate healthcare provision and incomplete personal data. The report raises the question whether these factors can also lead to inaccuracies in the administration of their court case, particularly when their health deteriorates in court custody.
The report identifies a number of concerns with a  negative impact on the welfare of those in custody, which include:-
  • Inadequate access to healthcare.  There is no on site medical support located in the custody area of any court and there is inadequate provision of medication. 10% of courts do not have any form of mental health support.
  • The condition of custody suites continues to fall below acceptable standards, with concerns of poor cleanliness of cells and inadequate facilities.
  • The escort and court custody arrangements for children and young people facing trial is unsatisfactory. YPs are treated like adults, placed in small windowless cells and cared for by custody officers with no special training.
  • Disabled people are frequently sent for trial at courts that are not accessible to them with the result that they are discriminated against and their dignity is not protected.
  • Close to half of the records sent by police and prisons when handing over custodies to the Prison Escort Services (PECS) contractors are inaccurate and more than half do not give sufficient information to allow proper risk assessments of the security and welfare of the DP to be made.
In this blog post, I am concentrating on the Lay Observers’ findings relating to poor healthcare. The healthcare standard is straightforward:
It is expected that people under escort and in court custody should have access to healthcare support at least equal to a member of the public and should be given appropriate treatment required to ensure that they are able to participate effectively in the court proceedings.
However, the report details a number of common failings; most important of which is that detained people often do not have access to their medication. Detained people often do not have medication for the full day, or medication is in the person’s property but is not made available during the day or that the dispensing instructions accompanying the medication are not specific enough to allow administration. In all these cases the person receives no medication at all. It is a common misconception with custody staff and their management that the police do not provide medication and therefore do not apparently escalate issues with police (or prisons) where the medication or the dispensing instructions have been inadequate.
With a number of health conditions, such as withdrawal from drugs (including heroin or methadone), anxiety, depression and personality disorders, the result of this can be a gradual deterioration in cognitive capability during the custody day due to the distress caused by the condition which may impair the capability of the individual to participate in court proceedings.
Of particular concern, because of the frequency of its occurrence, is the apparent absence of any protocol permitting the provision of methadone to a person suffering withdrawal whilst in court custody due to failures to ensure adequate provision by the originating custody. The impact of withdrawal on a person’s ability to participate in court proceedings can be quite severe, yet no treatment other than a sedative can be supplied even if a doctor attends.
Access to medical support is another key issue. Although detained people have the right to request to see a healthcare professional, there is no on site medical support located in the custody area of any court. The escort and custody contractors are required by their contract to make suitable arrangements for a healthcare professional to be available if needed in the court custody area. The escort contractors have sub-contracted a company to provide a helpline/triage service and the provision of medical advice, which is paid for within the overarching contract with minimal specification by HMPPS.
Routine reports from custody staff outside the London area are that the response time for a doctor at court is often four hours or more with the unsurprising consequence that court custody staff rarely call for advice on supporting detained people with health conditions, simply calling for an ambulance if they have serious concerns.
The report also notes that although mental health support has improved considerably over recent years, approximately 10% courts do not have any form of mental health support.

Conclusion

For me the most worrying issue raised by this important report is that all these important issues were raised in the previous year’s report (and before then), yet  none have been addressed in any meaningful waywww.russellwebster.com


Comments



Dear Katherine

I am very concerned about a very serious issue.  This in in regard to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC).  Whilst I was browsing the internet, I found that the CCRC have had their 20th Annual Conference in November 2017 in London, yet the general public and other bodies were not informed.  CCRC is the self claiming independent body of the Government, to be looking at Miscarriages of Justice, when it comes to referring cases back to the Court of Appeal.

My concern is, how come in the last 20 years, CCRC has never invited the general public and other institutes to these conferences.  What are they hiding? and from whom?

Can you please write something on your blogg regarding this matter.  In any miscarriage of justice including IPP and others, one has a right to attend and be free to speech.  Where is the democracy in this country? is it in the hands of Ministers or the people?

Thanks





 https://insidetime.org/ipp-knock-back/#comment-111956
 https://insidetime.org/enough-is-enough-2/
https://insidetime.org/exeter-prison-urgent-notification-protocol/
  • https://insidetime.org/the-maddest-idea/#comment-112526

No comments:

Post a Comment

comment

Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.