The recent high profile public concern about the people
languishing in prison on the long discredited IPP sentence is welcome, as is
the pressure to get them eased through the system and released back into the
community. The problem is that they are being recalled to prison.
There were 8,711 men and a handful of women and children who
had this open-ended sentence imposed on them. There are still over 4,000 in
prison (as at March 2017) of whom 711 had been recalled to prison having been
released. An examination of the figures gives a depressing picture.
Since 2011, there have been 1,670 recalls of people serving
an IPP, and now they are being recalled at almost the same rate as they are
being released.
In January to March this year, 153 IPP prisoners were released
but 124 were recalled. This is in contrast to the release of 110 mandatory
lifers (usually people who have been convicted of murder) of whom 48 were
recalled, still a worrying proportion but nothing like the number of IPPs.
Four people on an IPP who had been recalled to prison have
taken their own lives this year, the most recent was a 29 year old man in
Nottingham who was recalled for not sleeping at his hostel. The Parole Board
normally makes it condition of release to live in a hostel for a specified
time, even if people have a loving and supportive family or friends willing to
take them home. Hostels are really not loving and supportive and they rarely
provide daytime activities, leaving people to wander the streets aimlessly all
day.
The pressure on probation services mean that staff have huge
caseloads and are so risk-averse that a recall can be the default rather than
an exception.
People sentenced to an IPP had often committed serious
offences and may have had a range of complex needs. Their wellbeing was not
helped by being incarcerated for years longer than they had been led to believe
and had anticipated. Prison is a damaging environment. No wonder the
self-injury and death rate amongst these prisoners is so high.
So, I have been working for the last six months on a
solution.
Now that the sentence itself has been abolished, we need to
abolish the life licence and easy recall. I am waiting for the promised Courts
Bill to come to Parliament and I am pleased that eminent Peers have committed
to tabling an amendment to achieve this. We are busy drafting an amendment now.
I suggest a specified period of supervision and support as people who have
spent years in prison do indeed need help to resettle safely. I suggest that we
get rid of the administrative recalls that are causing havoc inside prisons and
leading to self-injury and suicide.
There are serious lessons here for politicians. Think
carefully, and listen to people who know, before you introduce catastrophic
legislation that blights lives, costs the public a fortune and puts the public
at risk. The good news is that the politicians who brought in the IPP have
admitted that it was a mistake. This shows integrity and courage; more
politicians should admit their mistakes more often. We would have a better
functioning justice system if they did.
kery Absolutely nailed it! My fiance got 2 abd a half year
IPP got his first parole and recalled for a couple of beers no further crimes
committed and alcohol was not on his risk factors! Hes now been back 6 years
now done 10 in total and being kept in for self harming and attempting suicide
(luckily he was revived!) Me him and my kids have been to hell and back its
financially, physically and emotionally broken us its disgusting and true that
rapists and murderers and paedophiles get treated better! It needs to stop!
North East families of 'trapped' prisoners protest outside HMP Prison House
Danny Weatherson's dad, Maurice Stevens, will join protest to fight for release of controversial Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentences
They have served prison sentences way beyond their original tariffs but now North East families are planning to protest as they step up a campaign to get their loved ones released.
The family and friends are of those caught up in the controversial Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentences which came into force for England and Wales in 2005 but was axed in 2012.
Danny Weatherson was just 18 when a judge recommended he served almost 16 months for two attempted robberies before he could apply for parole - but it took 11 years and nine months for him to be released.
He got out on July 3 and was told to spend three months in a hostel in Leeds before being allowed to return to home soil in Newcastle.
Frustrated over not being with his family, without benefits and miles away from home, Danny threw a chair on the floor in the hostel which bounced and cracked a window.
It was on his 29th birthday on July 18 and he was recalled to prison.
Now dad Maurice Stevens, 45, of Lemington, Newcastle, is joining scores of others to protest against the IPP sentences outside the gates of Holme House Prison in Stockton on October 7.
'I've lost hope' - IPP Michael Presley hits out in video. He escaped prison to send a message on video then re turned 24 hours lather.
from prison posted a video criticising his ‘disgraceful’ sentence, after being kept behind bars for two years longer than his jail term.
Michael Presley, who has served five years following a three-year sentence for GBH, escaped from prison and called on the Ministry of Justice to release him and thousands of other inmates serving controversial indeterminate sentences
The 24-year-old from Didcot then handed himself back on Wednesday less than 24 hours after escaping HMP Spring Hill in Aylesbury.
HMP Spring Hill in Aylesbury it had deteriorated, becoming less safe and affected by staffing shortages.http://howardleague.org/news/aylesburyinspection170817/
given a Sentence of Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) which only sets a minimum time behind bars.
He has now served more than five years in prison.
Presley, who has a five-year-old daughter, was told he would have to wait another 15 months for a Parole Board review shortly before he escaped prison on Tuesday night.
In his video, he said: “The sentence is a disgrace. You took me away from my daughter, my family, every single person I loved got taken away from me because I made one stupid mistake when I was 17.
“It’s not acceptable – I’m saying this to get my voice out and for every other IPP prisoner that’s serving.
“It’s not right, I’ve lost absolutely everything, I lost hope, I lost faith and I don’t see any light at the end of the tunnel.”
He is one of more than 3,000 currently serving an IPP – which sets a minimum sentence only.
A prisoner must then satisfy a Parole Board that he or she is no longer a danger to the public.
He called on the Ministry of Justice and Justice Secretary David Lidington to commute IPP sentences.
The Government abolished IPP sentences in 2012 just months after Presley was sentenced. It followed a joint report in 2010 by the chief inspectors of prisons and probation which said that IPP sentences were unsustainable with UK prison overcrowding.
Presley’s brother David, who lives in Didcot, told the Oxford Mail he was concerned about the high suicide rate among IPP prisoners and that Michael felt ‘no hope’ after being denied the chance to even face the Parole Board on several occasions.
His sister Kim, who was his legal guardian at the time of the offence, said: “The biggest issue is the mental health side of things - he’s been left in there for years not knowing when he’s going to come home.
“These IPP sentences don’t just affect the prisoners, they hurt the whole family - we have been hoping and praying every time a new appointment with the Parole Board is scheduled that maybe this time he will come home.
“We are not saying he is innocent, but he’s not the same boy who went in - we are proud of the man he has become and he has served his time - he should be released.”
The 27-year-old said her brother had changed since being behind bars and was well-liked by fellow prisoners and guards during his time at a maximum security prison in Milton Keynes.
But she said the family were ‘disgusted’ by his escape from prison.
She said: “We are disgusted at what he has done and it means the wait will be even longer.
“He just wanted to be heard.”
Alex Hewson, Policy and Communications Officer at the Prison Reform Trust said: “As this tragic case shows, frustration, anguish and despair are the enduring legacy of the IPP sentence, despite its abolition five years ago.
Thousands remain stuck in our prisons, years longer than was ever envisaged; not there for what they have done, but for what they might do.”
He added: “Despite recent welcome efforts by the Parole Board and prison service to speed up the release of the remaining IPP prisoner population, without legislative action thousands of people will continue to be caught in indefinite detention.
“The Parole Board has already made sensible recommendations for executive release and conversion to determinate sentences, the onus is now on the government to act and finally put an end to this unfair and unjust sentence.”
A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: “We are determined to address the challenge of making sure all IPP prisoners have the support they need to show they are no longer a threat to public safety.
“We have been working closely with the Parole Board to process these cases as quickly as possible and, earlier this year, we set up a new unit focused on this and improving the efficiency of the parole process.”
Presley was charged with escaping from lawful custody and appeared at High Wycombe Magistrates Court yesterday.
Calls from Sister of James Ward and other family's to release all IPP Prisoners over tariff.
She said: “I had goosebumps watching his video, he has clearly been pushed to this, to escape just to get his voice out.
Owen Sad to hear that he was recalled, great to hear that his family are fighting for him. The more this stays in the news the more pressure it puts on Mr Lidington. IPP must be removed retrospectively! Inexcusable, persistent, persecution!Just a thought, your letter to the parole board and your MP. How about sending them to Sophie Barnes. She is a journalist and may well be interested in doing a piece to show how still IPPs are being let down by the parole board. She will be discreet about names. At the moment so many stories of despair and disbelief 😢 hang in there I know someone who has just been released after 3 previous long deferrals.
So. The Parole Board screws up yet again. My grandson's hearing (already about 6 months overdue, and the one before was nearly a year overdue) was due on Monday. TODAY they e-mailed to say it had been deferred - maybe as late as February 2018. No reason given. They did the same thing last time - at less than 24 hours' notice. Words fail me. I've already sent a blistering e-mail to the CEO of the Parole Board, asking for an explanation. Don't worry...I'm not giving up any time soon! I think I'll e-mail Mr Gathercole as well, just to see what he comes up withI know him from a meeting at the MoJ on the topic of IPPs a while ago, with Katherine Gleeson. I'm not writing to my MP because He's a total waste of space. I tried before and got nowhere on a couple of matters.
BrackenburyThats disgusting!! Im so sorry for you all parole should be held accountable for these delays! Better still they shouldnt be allowed to do it in the first place! I hope his solicitor whacks in a compensation claim for unfair prolonged suffering! My partners just got his for december! No doubt being so close to christmas we will suffer the same fate! Just lies lies lies isnt it.
Pettit Delays shouldn't be allowed . It is not fair on those waiting inside and out.Those waiting get deflated when his happens and when they are vulnerable I just leads to stress ,anxiety, depression, etc Then who has to deal with it ?? .I think it is about time government sorted his out properly and get rid of his IPP altogether. Enough is enough.
ColesMy son was meant to have his parole on 20th September but they didn't do it they told him to be good from now till January with no nickings then they will do his parole. They did this last time . It's disgusting he's done nearly 12 years even though he only got 2 years Ipp.His mental health is getting worse.
CrosbyAll ipp prisoners should be released immediately. It was abolished and still these people and their families are still suffering. I find it cruel to have a person not know when they have a release date. They have served their time and gone over their tariffs only to be left not knowing when they will return to their lobed ones....
KhanIf the ipp is abolished then everyone over tariff shud be released and the licence shud be reduced to applying at the 5 yr mark at least !!!
(Transcript of the speech, exactly as it was delivered)
The Minister for Crime, Safeguarding and Vulnerability was speaking at the joint National Police Chiefs Council and College of Policing conference on mental health.
First of all, I would like to pay tribute to Mr Herbert, I can’t believe I’m the only person in the room that thought that was an incredibly powerful and moving account, which starkly brings home the devastating consequences for both the person in a mental health crisis, their loved ones and the professionals working in that environment, when systems just don’t get it right and work as we all would wish.
And also to our keynote speaker, His Royal Highness, Prince William. Both himself, and his brother, have been highly influential in breaking taboos by speaking out about mental health and I think their willingness to talk openly about mental health issues is illustrative of a wider trend in society to tackle misplaced stigmas; helping individuals to seek help; and galvanising all of our commitment to improving responses to all those people suffering mental ill health.
I also commend the organisers of this event, for their hard work in putting all this together, enabling us to reflect on recent developments and some successes, but clearly as we heard so well this morning, there remains many challenges I know we would all want to face honestly, openly with vigour and work together to take on.
Now every day I know there are many, many police officers who refuse to turn their backs on those in need. I have seen this for myself out on the beat with officers in my own constituency. They work professionally and humanely to help individuals to the best of their ability – often going well beyond what might reasonably be expected of traditional police
Sometimes police will have to be involved in incidents involving mental ill health. Mental health conditions, often in combination with other issues such as substance misuse, can cause people to act irrationally and out of character, and it is very difficult for the police in that situation to identify what is going on and that at the root of that behaviour that person is actually very unwell. And it is very difficult for police officers to know what to do for the best in such circumstances both to protect the individual and the community.
It is not necessary to be an expert in this field to be aware of the very high, and increasing, demand for mental health services of all types. Members of this audience will know only too well, that the police can be asked to deal with a wide variety of cases involving people who are unwell and in distress.
We have taken a number of steps to better equip the police and criminal justice system in this regard – we’ve heard this morning of improvements to the Liaison and Diversion schemes for example. But the pressures on front line officers to make quick judgements and act appropriately cannot be overestimated.
As the Prime Minister has repeatedly said - we are clear that the police should not be expected to act in the stead of health professionals. They cannot be expected to do that satisfactorily – and it takes them away from their primary function of tackling crime. Nor can it be in the best interests of the people affected, who need quick access to professional mental health assistance.
There clearly remains much more to do to get this balance right. However, recent years have seen huge progress in the way in which we respond to those in crisis. In many cases the police have acted as a catalyst for changes that have occurred. And at local level they are often at the vanguard in driving innovation and solutions to local issues.
We’ve seen for example, seen dramatic reductions in the use of police cells as places of safety in the last few years, and a commensurate rise in the use of health based places and this has largely been achieved through determined, joint working at local level between the police and health partners. According to the 2015/16 police figures on the use of section 136, a handful of police areas have already managed to eliminate entirely, or almost so, reliance on police cells as places of safety and we expect further encouraging progress when the 2016/17 figures are published later this autumn.
To help maintain this, the government has already provided some £15 million of funding to 88 projects in local areas to invest in increasing the numbers of suitable places of safety. We have committed a further £15m to continue this work, and to explore innovative local ideas for maximising the provision of suitable safe places, working with a range of partners, including community and voluntary groups.
Changes to mental health legislation in the Policing and Crime Act - which we expect to come into effect before the end of the year - are also designed to further improve our response to those in crisis. They offer local areas greater flexibility to adapt and cater to local needs, while reinforcing good practice. The goal is simply to ensure the most appropriate course of action in each case, and to achieve better outcomes for those in crisis as a result.
As we have heard today, amongst the more significant changes are the banning of the use of police cells as places of safety for those under 18 years of age, and there will be severe restrictions on their use in the case of adults.
We are also reducing the periods for which people may be detained pending a mental health assessment. And we are making more explicit the freedom of local areas to work creatively and in collaboration with a range of partners to develop networks of suitable places of safety – including outside traditional health settings.
We have heard of some great examples today of innovation and all local areas will need to take a careful look at their local provision, in the light of the new legislation, to ensure that it is good enough. They may also need to refresh their local joint working practices to reflect the need to act more quickly and collaboratively to provide the most appropriate help for people in crisis.
In the meantime, we do not count this as a ‘job done’. The government has made a clear commitment to continuing to improve mental health services - including but not limited to:
investing a billion pounds in mental health services by 2020 to improve mental health support in the community; in Accident and Emergency Departments, and in crisis provision and treatment options both for adults and children
implementing the recommendations of the Mental Health Taskforce review and its five year forward look
and, will be reviewing the Mental Health Act as committed to in the Queen’s speech
As we all know, legislation alone is not the answer to the complex series of challenges posed by mental ill health. Nor can these be dealt with by any single organisation. In addition to personal health and well-being issues, mental ill health can affect matters as diverse as employment, having a decent home, education and family life. It can also increase an individual’s vulnerability to crime, illness, and social isolation.
Providing effective interventions and support in that context can be challenging, and they demand a partnership approach.
Effective multi-agency working is therefore vitally important in seeking to identify and iron out problem issues. Meaningful change is achieved by committed and dedicated leaders at local level being willing to grapple with the challenges, and work collaboratively to overcome them. I have said before that ‘leaders’ are not just the people in charge, not just the people at the top of organisations. Anyone in an organisation can be a systems’ leader and effect change from within, and often in my experience this comes from those closer to the front line.
Now the Crisis Care Concordat has been mentioned several times this morning, and it has proved to be a really strong way of driving better change and led to far better working between the police and mental health professionals. I can assure you that it remains an important body. We will continue with this work, which is looking at what works locally as well as sharing practice, but also looking at what more we need to do at a national level.
To conclude, I would like to assure you that I and the government will continue to do all that we can to ensure that you are properly supported in this vital area of work. And that we will move to a future where the response to those with mental health issues are delivered by the right agency at the right time.
In the meantime, I would like to extend my most sincere appreciation and gratitude for all that you do. Whether responding to individual cases; challenging the status quo; or driving innovation and change - you are consistently setting the highest standards of public service and I thank you.
Podcast behind bars with a mental illness
BBc News broadcast 15 September 2017This is a full transcript of 'Behind Bars with a Mental Illness' as presented by Damon Rose and Beth Rose
This is a full transcript of 'Behind Bars with a Mental Illness' as
DAMON- This is Inside Ouch, I'm Damon Rose and with me is Beth Rose - not related.
BETH - Hello, have to clarify that, yeah.
DAMON
- Always have to say that. This week prisons and mental health have
been in the news a fair bit. You may have heard of the case of James Ward
that has been in the headlines in the past few weeks. He was the man
who was jailed for 22 months but ended up doing an 11-year sentence from
2006 and has just been let out. And this was due to IPP, imprisonment
for public protection. And also the London Assembly have completed a
report on the welfare of prisoners with mental health difficulties and
after prison care.
Everybody's experiences of prison are
different, and earlier we spoke to Ria who had mental health
difficulties which led her to being put on remand for five months in
prison. And we'll hear all about this from her in a second.
But before we go into it we should say that there
are some quite distressing moments in this interview which talk about
suicide and psychosis, and if this isn't the kind of thing you want to
hear at the moment please do turn off and come back to us again next
week.
Here's the interview, this is Ria:
RIA - I ended up
in prison because I had a psychotic breakdown and that culminated in me
setting my house on fire, and I was charged with arson, recklessly
endangering life, and sent to prison on remand.
DAMON - You were
unwell. I think a lot of people would be perhaps surprised or confused
that you weren't put into hospital at that time
RIA
- It was 12 years ago; I have no idea in what way things are different
now, if they are different. Yeah, people would be surprised, but prison
is full of people with mental health problems so it's not unusual.
BETH
- At the time did no one speak to you about your current health
situation or whether you should go to the hospital? Were you just taken
straight to the police station?
RIA - I was taken straight to the
police station. While I was there I did have three assessments with
three different medics. I have no idea what those assessments were
about. I think they were about whether I was in a fit state to have a
police interview. I can't tell you if there was any thought of me going
to hospital. I was not in a good state myself; I didn't really know what
was going on.
BETH - I've not been in that situation myself, but
do they give you access to a GP or anything? Because it seems if you're
in that kind of situation and you're not really sure what's going on
and no one's explaining, and quite evidently you're not acting as you
normally might, that there should be some kind of intervention at some
point.
RIA - Yeah, there was definitely not any kind of
intervention beyond these three different assessments where I was asked
questions that I didn't really understand and found very confusing. I
had to shout all my answers because there was so much going on in my
head, so much noise and confusion that the only way to speak was to
really hold on very hard to one chain of thought and kind of force it
out of my head.
I mean, I've pretty much had mental health
problems all my life kind of on and off, or meaning there are times
within that where I function better than others. And at this particular
point in my life a very close friend of mine from childhood had taken
her life a year previously and this had a massive impact on me.
Ultimately I had a psychotic breakdown through dealing with my grief
over her suicide.
Being psychotic is a bit like being in a dream
where all the rules about how the world works are different, anything
can happen. I'd been unable to eat because I thought I was being
poisoned. There was a lot of energy in my head and the only way to deal
with that was to walk a lot. I thought people were following me. I had
to paint out my windows because I thought satellites were spying on me
from the sky. It was a very frightening time.
DAMON - People
perhaps think that you're perhaps born a little bit, I don't know, more
vulnerable to these kinds of things. But from my experiences over the
year often it's an incident like a death that can bring on something
like this, experiences that you've never had before.
RIA - Yeah,
my psychosis was totally wrapped up with my grief and my friend, and
things to do with my own life too, but yeah, it was triggered by my
friend dying.
One of the things that was happening for me was
that I was incredibly volatile, which is not something I'd really
experienced before. So, I was just having really overwhelming emotions
that I couldn't really control or contain. There was one day that I was
walking down a road and I was just so angry that I jumped on every
single car in the road, and then I picked up bricks and rocks and I
started throwing them at people's houses, at their windows. And a bit
further down the road there was a woman with a toddler and I saw her
kind of clutch him to her and go in her gate and shut the gate and
quickly go into the house. And seeing this kind of brought me down a bit
and I just thought, wow, she thought I was going to hurt her! Of course
she thought I was going to hurt her, like I was throwing bricks around.
And it just horrified me that someone would think that, that I would
frighten someone like that. So, I got myself home and when I got home I
just decided that's it, if I can't control what's happening for me then
I'm not safe and I won't leave the house again.
DAMON - How long after this incident was it before you set light to your house?
RIA
- I'd say a few days. I don't know really but I'd guess a few days. I
was very frightened still. I used to sleep in my airing cupboard because
that felt like the only place that was safe. And then one day I just
thought okay, I do have to kill myself, that's the only way I can get
out of this situation. And there was a bit of a release in that I
suppose. I spent a few hours running around my flat trashing everything
because nothing mattered anymore. And I knew that I had to die by fire
because I felt that I was poison and everything I'd ever touched was
poison and if I needed to leave the Earth I needed to leave any trace
that I had ever existed.
Another thing that was happening was I
thought people were reading my mind, I thought I was being assessed by
social services, I thought that they had got people out of the house.
And because they knew and they hadn't stopped me I understood that as
permission because killing yourself is not illegal - obviously setting
your house on fire is, but I didn't really think about that. So, yeah
that's the day that led up to it.
DAMON - And so you set the house on fire. Can you tell us about that?
RIA
- Yeah. There was a pile in the corner that was my kind of worst things
that had to go, the things that I did not want anyone to see. They were
things like things I'd written, pictures I'd drawn; I felt like these
were the things that were full of my poison and needed to be eradicated
so that's where I started the fire. And it went up really quickly. It
was quite shocking. I remember running to my flat door and shouting,
"If
there's anyone in the building I suggest you get out now" and I went
back in the flat and I locked the door and I watched the fire for a
while and I got very frightened and I phoned my friend and I told her
what I'd done and she told me to get out, and I wouldn't. At some point
in had to go into the bathroom because the fire had got so big that that
was the only place I could be. And she did eventually convince me to
get out but it was too late to get out through the door by then so I had
to climb up onto the roof, and the fire brigade rescued me off the
roof.
BETH - When the fire brigade rescued you on that evening did you basically get taken straight into police custody from then?
RIA
- No, when I came off my roof half my street was out there, some of
them taking photos. I couldn't cope with being looked at like that so I
just walked off round the corner and sat on the wall and waited to be
arrested; like I knew that was what was going to happen. So, yeah, the
police found me there and arrested me there.
BETH - And they didn't even take you to like accident and emergency or anything?
RIA - No.
BETH - Which is really shocking in itself, someone who's been rescued from a fire and then taken straight to custody.
RIA - Yeah.
BETH - You had your friend with you, did you?
RIA - Yeah.
BETH - And was she able to talk and try and explain the situation to the police?
RIA - Yes she did talk to them and she was there with me. They even let her in the police cell with me, which I think is quite unusual, but I was so distressed. But once you're in that system there's not much can be done really, there's a series of stages you go through; there's not really anything that can deviate from that.
BETH - It just seems really difficult to comprehend that someone in such an obvious state of ill health can just be put in a cell and just put in a system that seems unrelenting until you end up in prison ultimately.
DAMON- After this point. And what were you charged with?
RIA - Arson, recklessly endangering life.
DAMON- And this is when you were put on remand?
RIA - Yes.
DAMON- So, they didn't allow you home. You went to a prison.
RIA - yes.
DAMONAnd what happened when you got there?
RIA - I got sent straight to the hospital wing. Yeah, I was terrified. I'd never been in prison before, and the stories out there about what prison is like are not very accurate, but how would you know that when you first arrive and are psychotic and struggling to work out what's happening and what isn't happening anyway?
I ended up on the hospital wing which is a small unit, it's very noisy, it's full of very distressed women, there's a lot of crying and shouting.
DAMON- And there was one particular shout that you heard a lot from one person, wasn't there?
RIA - Yeah, there was one woman who pretty much, it went on pretty much 24/7 and it reverberated all around the wing, she would just pound on the door of her cell shouting, "He's a paedophile! He's a paedophile! He's a dirty [swears] paedophile!" And I was so sound sensitive at that point and these words I just felt them pounding into my bones.
BETH - You say it's like a hospital wing; did you get good psychiatric and other healthcare or is it just a name for another section of the prison?
RIA - It's just a name for another section of the prison. [Wry laugh] That's maybe not fair. I didn't get any kind of treatment while I was in the hospital. I did get a little bit of support; there was a CPN, a community psychiatric nurse - I think they might have a different name when they're in prison - who would come and see me, and she was kind. And yeah, kindness is really important all the time, but in prison where there's so little kindness it does make a difference. But I didn't see a doctor or anything like that.
BETH - And before prison did you have a medical plan in place? Were you on medication or did you see counsellors?
RIA - No, I wasn't on medication. Leading up to the fire I had seen my GP. I had asked her to be in hospital. I said, "I'm not safe" and she had told me that these days people are much more often looked after in the community; which is fine, like hospitals are pretty horrible places, but it's very hard to keep an appointment when you don't know what year it is, never mind what day of the week or what time it is.
One of the beliefs that I had at the time was that everything going on around me was a simulation that people had put in place for me to learn something. And I was sat on the prison wing waiting for my friends to stop this particular simulation and say, "It's okay, she's learned enough now, we don't need to keep doing this". And I think at some point I just realised that wasn't going to happen and that I was in prison and that this was my life now and if I was going to be able to cope with what was happening I needed my head to work like it used to work. And I just did everything I could to try and get my head back again. For me that meant I'd pace my cell to try and burn off some of the energy. I did an awful lot of writing; I did lots of drawing; I'd sing. I did a lot of maths; that's something that helped my head. [Laughs]
BETH - Just maths that you came up with yourself?
RIA - No I asked for a textbook, because there was just something really reassuring that I could still do maths, like that part of my head still worked.
BETH - And then did that all stop after your months and you were transferred back to the main prison?
RIA - Yes.
BETH - And you were just kind of left in your cell to get on with the menial tasks?
RIA - Yes.
BETH - And did that impact the progress you made or had you got yourself to another state where you were able to keep progressing?
RIA - Well, I did come round from the kind of most acute phase of my psychosis. That happened before I left the hospital wing; that's why I left the hospital wing. But my experience of being on the main prison and not being psychotic was actually it made me really depressed. While I was psychotic I actually had quite a lot of tools that I could use to cope with what was happening. For example I could project soothing images onto the wall to look at. My mind was very malleable. And once I couldn't do that anymore I was just very aware of how bleak my surroundings were and how much distress I was sitting around. It was a very difficult environment to be in and I was very depressed.
DAMON- So, you tried to take things under your own control and burn away some of the energy and things like that. Was this something that continued, were you trying to help yourself further during this period?
RIA - Well, I was still able to do that by I got a job as a wing cleaner, which is quite a physical job, so that helped.
DAMON- After was it five months you were allowed to leave?
RIA - Yeah. One of the things about prison is communication is really difficult, so I had no idea that my solicitor was going to court to get me bail. Someone just opened the cell door one day and said, "You're going home - now". [Laughs] So, yeah I was released. My friend was waiting for me; I went and stayed with a friend while I waited for trial.
DAMON- And you didn't have a home?
RIA - No, I didn't have a home.
BETH - And what happened when it came round to the trial? Was it a long drawn-out process or was it quite quick?
RIA - It was very quick. After the first morning the judge took my solicitor and my barrister into chambers and said, "You need to tell her to plead guilty and if she doesn't plead guilty I will direct the jury to find her guilty and I will send her to prison". So, I changed my plea.
BETH - Wow! And was there any mention of your mental health at all?
RIA - Not at that stage. My mental health came up at sentencing as a kind of mitigating factor.
BETH - And what was the result of the trial?
RIA - I was sentenced with a three-year community order including psychiatric supervision.
DAMON- So, you regularly had to see a psychiatrist?
RIA - Yeah, I had to see a psychiatrist and I had a community psychiatric nurse as well.
DAMON- And how was that?
RIA - [Laughs] Well, as far as I'm concerned it hindered my capacity to get on with my life. I'd been diagnosed with schizoaffective disorder by this stage but I was doing really well; I wasn't psychotic, I wasn't in the state I was in before I set my house on fire. The psychiatrist said that I had to take medication to cover his back, and I asked him that my treatment be based on my needs rather than what might happened to him if it goes wrong, and he just laughed and said any psychiatrist would medicate me. So, I ended up on antipsychotic mood stabilisers and antidepressants. They're horrible drugs, they're toxic; they have horrible side effects. For me I didn't really start getting on with my life until I'd finished my psychiatric supervision and could take myself off the medication.
DAMON - And that was what, three years later?
RIA - It actually didn't last as long as three years in the end. I think it was something like 18 months because I was doing okay.
BETH - And how has all of that impacted on your life now, sort of 12 years on or nine years on?
RIA - It's something that always comes up if I ever go for a job. My conviction is spent which means that I shouldn't have to tell people, but I usually work for the kind of jobs that require enhanced police - it's not CRB checks anymore - DBS checks where you have to declare everything. So, I have to say, "Yeah, once I burnt my house down" which sounds terrible, so then I have to say, "But I had mental health problems at the time", so then it's like you can discriminate against me for being a criminal or you can discriminate against me for having mental health problems, take your pick.
BETH - And what kind of job or jobs have you gone on to do with these increased DBS checks?
RIA - I'm not working at the moment because my mental health is bad right now, but up until a few years ago I worked as a children's counsellor.
BETH - Was that for specific childcare needs or mental health or anything?
RIA - I worked mostly in schools just with kids who had various difficulties.
BETH - Do you think your experience of the system or maybe despite the system helped you in that role?
RIA - I don't know really. I think I'm probably much less judgemental than I might have been had I not been through that experience.
DAMON- And that job I think a lot of people would be quite surprised to hear that you were able to gain the trust of an employer who would allow you to work with children and be a counsellor.
RIA - Sure yeah. I'm good at what I do, and obviously I had to find a way to demonstrate that. But once one person has agreed to it, once one person has decided they'll take that risk, it's a lot easier because I can say, "Yeah, once I burnt my house down but I've done this since and this person will vouch for me".
DAMON - But you're not too well at the moment you say?
RIA - No.
DAMON- And you're being looked after?
RIA - [Laughs]
DAMON - Are you looking after yourself?
RIA - I'm just laughing because in terms of support for people with mental health problems there's not a lot out there. I'm doing okay. I find my own way; I find my own way of getting help and support generally.
DAMON- Has that experience in prison been a very bad experience that has affected the rest of your life negatively?
RIA - I'd say yes. I don't know. It's a bit dramatic putting it like that but it was the most…
DAMON - How would you put it?
RIA - I always say prison was the most soul-destroying experience of my life. But the other option might have been that I end up in hospital. And at least if you go down the criminal justice route you end up with a fixed sentence, or most people do or do now, and there's an end point; whereas if I'd been diverted to hospital at that point I might still be there now.
BETH - We should just reiterate that Ria's story relates to 12 years ago. But if you've got your own experience then please do get in touch because we do love to hear from you. And you can get in touch in a variety of ways: we're on Facebook at bbcouch; we're on Twitter @bbcouch; you can of course email us and that is ouch@bbc.co.uk; or if you just like to see more of our stuff then visit our website, it's bbc.co.uk/disability.
Can probation Services Deliver? 2017
For today’s post, I have reproduced in full a recent (19 September 2017) speech by Probation Chief Inspector Dame Glenys Stacey on what is wrong with the probation service and what the Inspectorate aims to do to try to get it back on the right path.
Probation matters
Well over a quarter of a million people are supervised by youth offending and probation services each year. Many under probation supervision are not receiving the quality of services that they should, and yet we know that good probation services can change their lives and life chances.
Good youth offending and probation services also make a big difference to society as a whole. If all these services were delivered well, then the prison population would reduce, there would be fewer people sofa surfing or sleeping or begging on the streets, and fewer confused and lonely children and young people. Men, women and children currently afraid of assault could lead happier and safer lives, and yes, there would be less reoffending. These things really do matter – to those under probation supervision, to all of us working in criminal justice, and to society as a whole.
A lack of quality
But probation services are not being delivered consistently to the standard we expect. The National Probation Service, responsible for those assessed as high risk, it is delivering to an acceptable standard overall, although there are inconsistencies in the quality of work across the country, and some anomalies as well.
The majority of individuals, however, are categorized as medium or low risk, and although there are exceptions, the Community Rehabilitation Companies responsible for their supervision are not generally producing good quality work, not at all. Probation reform has not delivered the benefits that Transforming Rehabilitation promised, so far.
We rarely see the innovations expected to come with freeing up the market, and instead proposed new models, new ways of delivering probation services on the ground and supporting them with better IT systems have largely stalled. The voluntary and charitable sectors are much less engaged then government envisaged. Promised improvements in Through the Gate resettlement – mentors, real help with accommodation, education, training and employment for short sentence prisoners – have mostly not been delivered in any meaningful way. And too often, for those under probation supervision we find too little is done by CRCs. On inspection, we often find nowhere near enough purposeful activity or targeted intervention or even plain, personal contact.
Why is this?
Staff morale, workloads, training and line management are highly variable and need to improve if probation is to improve. Staff are change weary and more than that, too many are too overburdened with work. Their employing companies are financially stretched, with some unable to balance the books, as unexpected changes in the type of cases coming their way have resulted in lower payments than anticipated.
What to do?
The government must face this squarely, knowing that CRC contracts are currently set to run until late 2021. It must consider its options, in order for there to be any prospect of consistently good probation services nationwide.
Of course, these companies strive to meet performance targets set by contract – just as they should. That is the nature of contracts. Many achieve well against some of those targets, but often enough this is at a cost to the quality of work and the more enduring expectations we all have of probation services.
To give one example, CRCs commonly produce timely sentence plans, and so meet contract expectations, but those plans may not be good plans, comprehensive plans, based on a comprehensive assessment.
What is more, we find too often that despite sometimes heroic efforts by staff,
Measuring success
You would think at first sight that changes to the contract specification would do the trick. But the work that probation services can do locally, with local partners, to deal with complex, sometimes longstanding social problems and some of the most troubled and troubling people in society, so as to make a difference to those individuals’ life chances, this is very difficult to exemplify and then ensure, in a set of performance targets or measures.
This measurement problem is not unique to probation. Other caring professions may be equally difficult to measure, to quantify in this way, and for these type of services, independent inspection has a particular role to play.
For such services – probation services delivered in the community or perhaps services caring for the elderly in a care home – nothing beats stepping over the threshold, and looking with an experienced, wise eye at what is going on. In that way, independent inspectors can report objectively and faithfully how things are. They can hold up a mirror and reflect the simple, unadorned picture they see. That is what we do. But that alone does not drive improvement where it is needed, necessarily. Yes, we make recommendations and expect them to be followed, but that is not enough.
For probation services to improve where needed, a number of other things must happen. Firstly, government must – and it has started to do this – it must address the immediate funding issues, and do so carefully and wisely so as not to fall foul of contract law, so as not to create perverse incentives, and instead to secure more professional staff and specialist intervention services where needed.
Government must also make a plan, have a strategy for how probation services are to be delivered over the next decade. CRC contract end dates are not so far off. And meanwhile it must be as clear as possible about what it expects of probation services, and rebalance the oversight model, the way probation services are overseen, so as to focus squarely on those expectations.
It seems obvious to me that government should expect consistently good quality probation services, so that the public are sufficiently protected, individuals serve their community sentences productively and reoffending is reduced. For me, the problem arises underneath these enduring expectations of probation, as with Transforming Rehabilitation, probation providers were liberated from what were rather processy national standards so as to enable them to innovate.
As a consequence, and without good and commonly accepted national standards there is some confusion about what good looks like – what represents good probation services, and what is expected of probation services, actually. It is time to clarify that, and to fill that gap.
New standards
With government’s backing, we at HMI Probation are developing underpinning standards for probation services. They are not processy. Instead they are evidence based and take the best from international standards. We are developing these standards in a consensual way, working with the NPS and CRCs in particular – as they need to accept and adopt these standards with us, in order to make a difference.
We will inspect against these standards in due course. More than that, we will use them to describe what ‘good’ looks like, to provide some stakes in the ground, ways in which probation providers themselves can see where their services meet expected standards and where they need to improve.
So for example, we can be clear what good Unpaid Work looks like, and what outstanding Unpaid Work looks like – and what is plainly inadequate.
Ratings scale
And as we inspect we will rate NPS divisions and CRCs on a four point scale à la Ofsted:
Outstanding,
Good,
Requires Improvement, and
Inadequate
Driving improvement
We will do this because research shows that ratings drive improvement in immature or poorly performing markets. In other words, we think it will drive improvement where it is needed, and recognise and applaud good work when we see it as well.
To rate probation providers fairly, we must of course publish our standards and be clear how we will apply them, and of course we will do that, starting with a consultation in November. But we must also be sure of our judgements of probation providers and be sure they are fully reflective of a good evidence base in each inspection.
We will increase our case sample sizes so as to give us an 80% confidence level in case inspection findings, and we will inspect whole CRCs and whole divisions of the NPS. We will routinely inspect not just the long established areas of probation work, but new areas as well: Through the Gate work for example.
And because probation services are still volatile, we will inspect each NPS division and CRC annually, from the spring of next year.
We think that this increased emphasis on independent inspection, and standards will begin to rebalance the way probation providers are overseen. It will make clear what is expected of probation providers, and I have no doubt that most if not all providers will want to attain good independent inspection ratings.
Incidentally, I know that many across the range of criminal justice and wider public services will have mixed views about inspection, about being inspected. Some find it extremely burdensome, and in some services there is an industry in mock inspection, and preparing for inspection. Of course we expect organisations to be ready for inspection, but we don’t encourage over-prep.
We can often see, you know, the wet paint.
Inspectors have generally been inspected themselves, in their former lives, and know the game. I do urge against any overly enthusiastic approach to preparing for inspection. As HMI Probation will be inspecting annually, it is perhaps best to be proportionate in preparing for it, and then take it as it comes – something I will be stressing with probation leaders.
A co-ordinated approach
As I have said, I think our development of probation standards and more regular inspection are positive developments, capable of driving improvement where it is needed, but without further changes, the water remains muddy.
CRCs could feel conflicted, with our inspection standards on the one hand and then contract requirements on the other. And many remain financially stretched. Two additional things need to happen, in my view, to give us all the best prospect of success.
Firstly, CRCs must be put on a sufficiently stable financial footing. I have no doubt this is not straightforward: existing contracts and contract law must necessarily constrain matters, and there is a trick for government to pull off, if CRCs are to better funded and at the same incentivised to produce quality work.
And that for me is the second requirement – incentivisation. CRCs could be incentivized to produce quality work, exemplified by higher order HMI Probation ratings. For those achieving higher order ratings, there should be some recognition of that, and reward as well. That may come for example in the way they are then overseen, perhaps by a reduction in the overall oversight burden. Rewards don’t always have to be monetary, as we all know.
We are talking to government about these things. We are hopeful that government will find ways to incentivise and reward higher order HMI Probation ratings. And meanwhile we continue to inspect and report, while developing and agreeing new standards for probation that should over time mean that more people receive good quality probation services, to benefit them and society as a whole.
How can we reduce violence and end deaths in prisons? This free all-day conference will bring together experts in criminal justice, prison reform, politicians, academics, officials and journalists to seek solutions. Lunch provided.
The event will also see the launch of a new report by the Runnymede Trust and the University of Greenwich into prison violence and deaths.
Book now!
Thursday 19th October. 9.30am - 4.30pm, at the University of Greenwich, Old Royal Navy College, SE10 9LS.
Panels:
How can we reduce deaths of people with mental health issues in custody?
How can we reduce use of force in relation to BME prisoners?
How culturally-aware interventions can reduce reoffending rates of BME prisoners.
What role can prison officers play in reducing violence and deaths in prisons?
Speakers include:
Steve Reed - MP Croydon North
Frances Crook - Howard League for Penal Reform
Steve Gillan - General Secretary - Prison Officers Association
Patrick Vernon - Black Thrive
Professor Darrick Jolliffe - Professor of Criminology, University of hGreenwic
Dr Zubaida Huque - Research Associate, The Runnymede Trust
Deborah Coles - INQUEST
Date and Time
Location
University of Greenwich
Old Royal Navy College
London
SE10 9LS View Map
Event 2
COULD YOU DO TIME? Putting
your faith into action in our prisons or helping ex-offenders on
release? Come and listen to our exciting specialist speakers to find out
more at our free Prison Hope event.
SPEAKERS INCLUDE:
Peter Holloway, CEO Prison Fellowship England and Wales
Imam Abdul Dayan, Managing Chaplain at HMYOI Aylesbury
Revd Bob Wilson, Free Churches Faith Advisor to HMPPS
Peter Jones, Global Alpha for Prisons
David Portway, Aldates for Community Transformation (ACT)
Ex-offenders
Information
stalls to promote volunteering include Prison Alpha; Prison Fellowship;
Prison Visiting; New Leaf Project (mentoring)
IPP sentences were abolished in 2012 KATE LANGSTON Email Published: 05:00 Monday 18 September 2017 0 HAVE YOUR SAY MPs are calling for urgent action to assess the cases of more than 300 prisoners in Yorkshire who are facing indefinite jail sentences, warning that poor access to rehabilitation programmes and delays signing-off their release are fueling a crisis in the prison system. Figures obtained by the Yorkshire Post through a freedom of information request reveal that there are currently 309 inmates in the region detained under now-obsolete Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentences – 213 of whom have already served their original tariff. Earlier this year, the head of the public body charged with deciding whether these prisoners are safe for release warned a backlog in processing their cases had left many “stuck, festering” in a cell. The organisation has stressed it is committed to tackling these delays, but MPs argue the Government must do more to ensure IPP prisoners are being successfully rehabilitated. “The Conservative Government urgently needs to come forward with solutions that keep the public safe and that ensure that prisoners have access to the rehabilitation programs they need so they can leave prison as reformed characters,” said Shadow Justice Secretary Richard Burgon.
“IPP is creating an unnecessary burden on a prison system that is already at breaking point... The crisis in our prisons is fuelling a mental health epidemic and making rehabilitation much less likely. “All of these cases in our region must be urgently assessed. Where people have served the minimum tariff and no longer pose a danger to society, they should be given clarity as to when they will be released.” IPP sentences were introduced in 2005 as a means to ensure that dangerous offenders stay in custody for as long as they present a risk to society. Once an inmate has served a minimum “tariff”, they are required to satisfy the Parole Board they no longer pose a threat before they can be released.
The sentences were abolished in 2012 but not for existing prisoners, and critics have expressed concern about the length of time some less-serious offenders remain in jail beyond their tariff. Parole Board chairman Nick Hardwick spoke out earlier this year, calling for changes to the test to determine whether a inmate is fit for release and warning that some individuals “are stuck, festering, in prison long after the punishment part of the sentence”. The FOI figures show there are currently 309 offenders serving IPP sentences across 10 prisons in the Yorkshire area. 213 have already served their tariff. Wakefield has the highest overall number of IPP inmates (63) but Hull has the highest number that are “post-tariff” (52). Hull MP Emma Hardy said she would contact the Justice Secretary, David Lidington, “to urge the government to speed up the process of reviewing these cases”. “While it is definitely important to ensure that members of the public are protected, our justice system is also based upon the principle of certainty of sentence,” she said.
Alexander Hewson, of the Prison Reform Trust, said the sentences "cast a long shadow over our justice system", adding: "The onus is now on the Government to act and finally put an end to this unfair and unjust sentence." A spokesman for the Parole Board said the organisation is working to ensure that the majority of IPP prisoners have been safely released, "or... have clear plans in place that will enable them to progress", by the end of 2017. “We are also committed to reducing the backlog of cases waiting to be heard so that all prisoners, including IPPs, receive a timely hearing,” they said. A ministry of Justice spokesman said: “We are determined to address the challenge of making sure all IPP prisoners have the support they need to show they are no longer a threat to public safety. “We have been working closely with the Parole Board to process these cases as quickly as possible and, earlier this year, we set up a new unit focused on this and improving the efficiency of the parole process.”
Ask your MP to debate the IPP in the House of Parliament
Have your MP ask for an urgent review.
Set up a EDM
Ask you MP if he or she can set up room to discuss the IPP by booking a room in parliament so you and other families can attend. Ask Mp to invite the names below, who have been involved with IPP .
Jonathan Aitken
John Samuels,
Rt Hon Iain Duncan Smith MP, was at the last Sept IPP meeting.
lord Ramsbotham
Head of the church of England or representative,
Jonathan Aitkens former author, former member of parliament, former Cabinet Minister and former prisoner,
Lord Lloyd of Berwick, former Lord of Appeal in Ordinary,
Lord Faulks QC, Minister of State
Sir David Calvert-Smith, Chairman of the Parole Board,
Juliet Lyon, former Director of the Prison Reform Trust Pete Weatherby QC, barrister, Garden Court North Chambers
Jaz More pressure on the government to address the IPP crisis. They give the same old response's but its continued pressure that's needed and so far this year IPP has really been getting the attention it needs.
CrosbyAll ipp prisoners should be released immediately. It was abolished and still these people and their families are still suffering. I find it cruel to have a person not know when they have a release date. They have served their time and gone over their tariffs only to be left not knowing when they will return to their lobed ones...
KhanIf the ipp is abolished then everyone over tariff shud be released and the licence shud be reduced to applying at the 5 yr mark at least !!!
Zing David Lidington made a promise that victims of abuse would no longer be denied compensation. But critics of the new guidelines say his promise has been undermined.
BodenWe should all send a copy of this to our own MPs and say we expect the same from them.
😢 hang in there I know someone who has just been released after 3 previous long deferrals.
