Total Pageviews

Sunday, 7 May 2017

Is the Board making it easier for IPP prisoners?

Together we  make change
Postdate you may remember my invite  by Nick Hardwick and Martin Jones. In hand  25000 plus signatures  and   hundreds of your letters you sent to me via  and this was  tabled  and on the  1st November 2016 Parole Board Rules  came into force. "Your voice matters, you matter, keep us informed be heard . These rules empowered the Parole Board to release prisoners serving a sentence of Imprisonment for Public Protection on the papers without lengthy delays and more .... . You can read further on those changes tabled in the  blog Archive on right side of page.

Hine Solicitors firm   Quoted  Inside times

That  they have  secured the release of an IPP prisoner on the papers. Our client had spent a significant period in the community before being recalled after being charged with an offence of common assault. He was convicted of the common assault and recalled to custody. We managed to secure his release without the need for an Oral Hearing.
This rule change has the potential to allow those IPP prisoners who remain in custody the ability to obtain their release without having to endure the lengthy delays currently being experienced in obtaining an Oral Hearing. Given the number of hearings being conducted by the Parole Board, prisoners are waiting several months for their hearing to be listed.
What about Open Conditions?
Following the above rule change, the Parole Board Management committee have agreed two further policy changes to assist IPP prisoners to progress through the prison system. One of those changes is the ability to recommend a transfer to open conditions for those serving an IPP sentence on the papers without the need for an Oral Hearing.
What does this mean for IPP Prisoners?
Previously the power available to the Parole Board in relation to Open Conditions was limited. Whilst under the Board’s previous policy such prisoners could be recommended for open conditions at Member Case Assessment (MCA), such recommendations would only take place in exceptional circumstances and would require the approval of the Parole Board Chair. In the vast majority of cases any application for Open Conditions would be determined following oral evidence at an Oral Hearing.
The Parole Board, as they did with the ability to grant release on the papers, continue to offer IPP prisoners a route to progression which aims to limit the possibility for delay. The ability to progress prisoners to open conditions on the papers will further reduce the number of cases being heard by the Parole Board at Oral Hearings speeding up the process for everyone subject to Parole.
As a result, if the Panel considering your case at the MCA stage feel that your risk is manageable in less stringent conditions, they can make a recommendation for open conditions. You must remember that the Board can only provide a recommendation which the Secretary of State will need to ratify. Should this be done then you will ultimately be transferred to open conditions without the need to wait a lengthy period for an Oral Hearing.
Will I always get a hearing?
In addition to the above change, the Parole Board will no longer automatically send IPP recall cases to an Oral Hearing. Previously all IPP prisoners subject to recall would automatically be granted an Oral Hearing, no matter the circumstances. The only circumstances in which a hearing would not be granted would be where the prisoner specifically opted out of the Parole process.
Panel members will now have the ability to decide whether it is necessary to have an Oral Hearing or whether a negative decision should be made on the papers. A negative decision at the paper stage will result in the review concluding at which point the Secretary of State will then consider the issues in the case before setting the next review. The length of the next review will be dependent on the circumstances of the case and what needs to be achieved to reduce risk prior to the next review.
This change is an important one. Prisoners without support for a progressive move from their Offender Manager or Offender Supervisor will need to ensure that representations are submitted should they seek a progressive move. Without a positive application by the prisoner there is now the possibility that the Board will issue a negative decision on the papers.
We often deal with cases where prisoners have no support from the professionals in their case but because of oral arguments at the hearing, the Board issue a positive decision. Obtaining of an Oral Hearing is now even more important than it was before for those IPP prisoners subject to recall.
Do these rule changes apply to Lifers?
Unfortunately, these changes only apply to IPP prisoners. There is no provision for a progressive move on the papers for Life sentence prisoners; the Parole Board have no power to direct release or to recommend open conditions without oral evidence being taken. In addition, such prisoners remain entitled to an Oral Hearing unless they specifically request to not have one. As a result, life sentence prisoners subject to recall will automatically be granted an Oral Hearing for the Board to consider their case.
” A prisoner could wait several months to appear before the Board to give evidence only to have their application for release refused “
Should I seek Open Conditions on the Papers?
Given the nature of the change, it is highly likely that the Parole Board will only recommend progressive moves to prisoners who have the support of their Offender Manager and Offender Supervisor. Prisoners may find themselves in a situation where they seek release into the community but the professionals in the case feel that Open Conditions are more appropriate. In these circumstances, careful consideration should be given to the application being made to the Board.
A prisoner could wait several months to appear before the Board to give evidence only to have their application for release refused. The Board at the hearing could recommend open conditions which was potentially something they would have done back at MCA stage given the support of the professionals.
In these circumstances a prisoner would have lost out on a significant period waiting for the hearing to take place which could have been spent progressing in open conditions, had they have originally made an application for open conditions on the papers. Expert advice should be taken before making your application before the Board, taking into account the prospects of your application being successful and the practicalities of securing an Oral Hearing.
What can we do to help you?
We would encourage all IPP prisoners approaching the commencement of their reviews to contact us. Once we have taken your instructions we can draft and submit representations on your behalf to ensure your application has the best chance of success. We can consider your options and ensure you understand the impacts of these new changes; ensuring that any delays in obtaining a decision are kept to a minimum.
Any changes for determinate sentence recalls?
There have also been changes to the way in which the Parole Board deal with the recall of determinate sentence prisoners. The Parole Board recently ran a pilot which meant that prisoners subject to recall with less than 24 weeks remaining on their sentence would not be granted an Oral Hearing. Again, this was an attempt at reducing the number of hearings faced by the Board. This change has now been put on hold and as a result the current guidance for the Board is that cases where the prisoner has less than 12 weeks remaining on licence following recall will not be given an Oral Hearing.
This is not a blanket ban and should a prisoner have less than 12 weeks remaining on licence, arguments can still be made that an Oral Hearing be granted. The prisoner will need to show exceptional circumstances when seeking an Oral Hearing. Assistance from a specialist prison law lawyer can assist in making sure that such cases are considered carefully by the Parole Board.
Should you require any assistance with a Prison Law issue please contact our Prison Law department at Hine Solicitors on 01865 518971 or FREEPOST – RTHU – LEKE – HAZR Hine Solicitors, Seymour House, 285
Banbury Road, Oxford OX2 7JF.



Jez In my opinion the changes made are only nips and tucks around the edges. They do nothing to stem the real misery being suffered by the people that are behind a locked door with no end date on their incarceration. The test for release MUST be changed. As s it stands if they don't get on with their probation officer they are stuck. Torture is alive and well in her majesty's prison service. Human Rights in this country are only for those deemed worthy by her majesty's government. That's telling people they are less than human and that is torture!!
That's the biggest hurdle anyone can have with an ipp. That's why its even more important that the test for release is changed. That will than make a difference which will significantly help people who are innocent.
11 yrs next month into it an it's only now things have started to look up for my son they have finally started to help him an get things moving like placing him on courses an giving him work but it has taken 10 yrs for his so called probation to pick up his file in her office an then has the cheek to tell him to ask me NOT to fone her is she for real if she'd done her job in the 1st place I wouldn't need to b on her case same as the so called solicitor .
Umm Babes it's so draining all this like it's make me mad how they treat our ipps.... It's very unfair.... But we will see what parole say I doubt he will get paper review now... 💔💔💔..but got to wait September for his oral hearing.... So far away I just don't think he will be home this year I just lost hope in this system...Just how they make lies up to justify that he is a risk which in fact he isn't.. ...the shit that they have come out with made, me so mad upset and drained all in one...... How can theses ppl sleep at night knowing they are keeping a man inside when on his recall he was, found not guilty..... They are full of bull shit it really is, low what they said just one day it will be over but until then I will be his, rock... 100% right it's all twisted the whole system is a joke.And his brother... Just to justify keeping him inside as they don't have nothing else to keep him in this is why they have done it... But it's ok as the solicitors that I found for him are very good he gonna do a video link to talk bout his doisser and the lies they put in it..... But one day it will be over with.
Robinson I myself experienced this inhumane sentence and wouldn't wish it on my worst enemy, however every nightmare ends which brings a beautiful future with fresh beginnings. Just hang on in there it will sure be worth it!
Ginge To prove your not a risk in a system that is full of high risks, staffing issues,cutbacks,being locked in a cell for countless hours.... who decides how long a risk lasts for anyway? I find the whole thing a twisted horror tale almost like the brother grim them selfs wrote out laws.
i think parole boards should be called pre-crime units, and their members
BodenJustice Sub-Committee. Update. Parliament was prorogued on 27 April 2017 and formally dissolved on 3 May. The effect of the dissolution of Parliament is that all committees cease to exist, unless and until they are reappointed at the start of the new Parliament following the general election. House of Lords committees are likely to be reappointed in late June or early July 2017.


No comments:

Post a Comment


Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.