IPP Campaign on the 25th of May was a truly an achievement for which we all can stand tall. Thank you to friends and supporters, inmates and the families those who have put time, effort and energy into the campaign all individual, each giving to his or her strengths.

We still need people to ask there MPs to support the IPP moreover those who have conservative MPs as they are in power.
We STILL need a majority vote to change a law. Those who have not contacted there Mps need to and those who did not receive a response from there Mp needs to work on getting one.

What were we requesting?

1) We are hereby requesting the Secretary of State for Justice to exercise their power to change the release test for the IPP prisoners under Section 128 of the LASPO Act, for an effective system in place that works.
2) IPP sentences to be converted into extended sentences, as changing the release test will not necessarily get rid of the "99-year-licence" problem. The Lord Chief Justice agrees!!
3) To push the argument “” Lex posterior derogat priori” Meaning a later repeals an earlier one in a similar method to the effect of an Appeal or Supreme Court automatic overrules previous law on the subject .Maxim…. it needs to be acknowledged immediately.


 Photos of the Campaign day







Comments:

Kerry Cove Soon Brackenbury Wow pictures are awesome! Bet the atmosphere was electric! Well done all xx

Ruth Howard, Thank you all xxx

Adele Morgan, Picton Thank you to all that help organise attended and supported the protest job well-done xxx

Veronica Cooke, Some fabulous photos

Farrukh Alam, Thank you

Louise Sayers,Thank you for everything and everyone i mean it everyone was amazing today!!!!!!!! FREE THE IPP! what a day!!!!!

Na Ssa, Your energy was great Louise. Even if people are talking, looking at the petition, we've definitely achieved something. ..  hash tag, tagging mp's and celebs to try and spread the word.twitter account. Just think we may be able to reach more people that way and let people know about this injustice. Especially if we all have the same hashtag and get it trending

Kai Salter
Hope something changes with the ipp I done 5/12 years on 2 year tariff been out over 4 yrs now really do hope they do something as I i know first hand how hard it is.

Jez Owen Just wanted to thank everyone for all their effort yesterday. Katherine I take my hat off to you, your energy, commitment and passion is phenomenal. The two young ladies on the megaphone outside the ministry building were outstanding. Its not just aboutwhat you say, its also about the way you say it and I left there in no doubt that the MOJ heard our cries. Some people mentioned they wished more had turned up, that why couldn't have our march and protest been as big as the march was for British Steel? Well, there's a difference. All those people marching for that cause were British steel workers. There were 4000 people in our protest that were there in spirit, they were unable to attend because they simply can't. But I heard their cries in all our voices yesterday. They would be proud and humbled by all your commitment and steadfast determination to put a stop to their inexcusable persistent persecution. Keep writing to your MPs, keep writing to the Queen , keep writing to the church, keep writing to NOMS. Keep them busy replying to your pleas for fair justice. Tell your I.P.P not to give up because you will never give up. Give them your steadfast determination, your love and respect for the suffering they have to face everyday when the door shuts and they cant open it. When that door shuts they need to know that your the other side of it doing everything you can to get them out.

 

 

IPP lOBBY AND MARCH 25TH MAY “There may be times when we are powerless to prevent injustice, but there must never be a time when we fail to protest. Truth never damages a cause that is just”.

Great job everyone we finally got here please don’t go empty handed print info and flyers. Hand them out to "all the MPs ,other, and ask those to lobby the IPP. Good luck to those meeting with there MPs ,and I hope it all goes well. See you all on the day- "Wednesday 25th.

You may of noticed my spelling over time that because i have dyslexia and dyspraxia therefore i feel strong for those let down and and trapped.


As far Back and recent in  2008 the Joint Committee on Human Rights, in response to evidence submitted by the Prison Reform Trust, stated:
• I am are deeply concerned that the evidence indicates that, because of a failure to provide for their needs, people with learning disabilities may serve longer custodial sentences than others convicted of comparable crimes. ...
• interventions to reduce risk are adapted to be suitable for those with learning disability or difficulty”.

• Offending behaviour courses, offered as the one way to progress your sentence and demonstrate reduced risk, are in limited supply with long queues for these and for Parole Board reviews. People who are mentally ill, on medication or have a learning disability are effectively barred from these courses and barred from the only route out of this awful maze. neglecting its management responsibilities to the prison system.
• prisoner can only be released when the Parole Board decides that he/she can be safely managed in the community – in the meantime the prisoner is in effect serving preventive detention. But they see cognitive diffreculties as a risk, effectively trapping them.

Reform trust http://www.prisonreformtrust.org.uk/…/inspec…/hmi-probation…



What does the law say!

The law states you are discriminating by not to allowing those on the course that the institution must provide accommodations and not exclude
Reasonable adjustments in Education /courses
It’s against the law for a institution or other education provider to treat those with disability’s such as learning differences unfavourably. An education provider has a duty to make ‘reasonable adjustments’ to make those with learning differences are not discriminated against. These changes could include:
providing extra support and aids (like specialist teachers or equipment. This includes:
‘direct discrimination’ refusing admission to a inmate because of disability learning difference.
‘indirect discrimination’, eg only providing application forms in one format that may not be accessible.
‘discrimination arising from a disability’, eg a disabled pupil is prevented from going outside at break time because it takes too long to get there.
‘harassment’, eg a instructor shouts at a disabled student for not paying attention when the student’s disability stops them from easily concentrating
victimisation, eg suspending a person with learning difference because they’ve complained about harassment.
https://you.38degrees.org.uk/…/free-the-remaining-ipp-priso



 https://www.facebook.com/groups/bowde/

IPP, Email your Mp,s

 

 

 

 

.............................................................................................................................................................

Letter to David Ramsbotham

 

Subject: IPP

 

Dear Shelly,

I am sorry that you have not had a reply to your letters. Mine share the same fate! I will be mentioning IPP prisoners again when I speak in the debate on the Queen’s Speech on Tuesday, as I suspect will others, but I fear that I don’t have any influence over Mr Gove’s programme. 

 

Yours Sincerely, 

 

David Ramsbotham

.............................................................................................................. ..........................................

 

  

PREVIOUSE PAPER WORK WE WERE REQUESTING 2 THINGS however we are requesting 3 now. 

 

1)Secretary of State for Justice to exercise their power to change the release test for the IPP prisoners under Section 128 of the LASPO Act, for an effective system in place that works.

2) IPP sentences to be converted into extended sentences(including all IPP prisoners now out on licence), as changing the release test will not necessarily get rid of the "99-year-licence" problem. The Lord Chief Justice agrees!! 

ADDED IN    

3 ) Is to push home the arguments. "Lex posterior derogat priori"..... Meaning a later repeals an earlier one in a similar method to the effect of an Appeal or Supreme Court automatic overules previous law on the subject.. maxim......It needs to be aknowledged immediately ........and important to mention to Mp or correspondence on the day. I have enclosed a Template letter.

 

 

 

A Template For those who have “Not lobbied there Mps because they were unable to attend due to ill health.

 

 

 

House of Commons

London

SW1A 0AA

Dear .........................................MP

     

As one of your constituents I would like you to Lobby the injustice of IPP Sentences. I would like to table the house with the following questions to that we can find a Solution and give this sentence an end date .

Secretary of State for Justice to exercise their power to change the release test for the IPP prisoners under Section 128 of the LASPO Act, for an effective system in place that works. IPP sentences to be converted into extended sentences, as changing the release test will not necessarily get rid of the "99-year-licence" problem.

The Lord Chief Justice agrees!! The answer could be to having our loved ones released. Is to push home the arguments. "Lex posterior derogat priori"..... Meaning a later repeals an earlier one in a similar method to the effect of an Appeal or Supreme Court automatic overules previous law on the subject.. maxim.......

I hope soon to talk to you in person with my concerns on a date convenient to you. I really care about this issue because ADD PERSONAL STORY HERE or add the line this issue has deeply affected my family.

I am looking forward to hearing from you soon

A Template For those who “have lobbied and want there MPs to debate the IPP at the queens speech

House of Commons

London 

SW1A 0AA 

       

Dear .........................................MP 

   

May I ask if you will be attending the queens speech on Thursday as one of your constituents effected by the IPP i like for you to debate the ipp on the following questions to find a Solution and give the sentence an end date.

 

Secretary of State for Justice to exercise their power to change the release test for the IPP prisoners under Section 128 of the LASPO Act, for an effective system in place that works. IPP sentences to be converted into extended sentences, as changing the release test will not necessarily get rid of the "99-year-licence" problem. The Lord Chief Justice agrees!! The answer could be to having our loved ones released. Is to push home the arguments. "Lex posterior derogat priori"..... Meaning a later repeals an earlier one in a similar method to the effect of an Appeal or Supreme Court automatic overules previous law on the subject.. maxim....... Further if he/ she was attending the queens speech and if so would they SPEAK ON THE IPP in the debate ( the Queen’s Speech on Tuesday). as you know that each House continues the debate over the planned legislative programme for several days, looking at different subject areas. 

 

I am looking forward to hearing from you soon

Yours sincerely,

 

 

 

 ADD IN NAME ADDRESS OTHER .

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The long awaited policy on ROTL (release on temporary licence) is now out. Prison Service Instruc- tion 13/22015 was issued on 23rd March. Some of the regu- lations are the same as the interim rules but there are some important changes.

 

25th May IPP Lobby .March

What are we requesting?

1) We are hereby requesting the Secretary of State for Justice to exercise their power to change the release test for the IPP prisoners under Section 128 of the LASPO Act, for an effective system in place that works.

2) IPP sentences to be converted into extended sentences, as changing the release test will not necessarily get rid of the "99-year-licence" problem. The Lord Chief Justice agrees!!

The answer could be to having our loved ones released..

3 ) Is to push home the arguments. "Lex posterior derogat priori"..... Meaning a later repeals an earlier one in a similar method to the effect of an Appeal or Supreme Court automatic overules previous law on the subject.. maxim.......It needs to be aknowledged immediately .........

Restricted ROTL

The PSI is very clear that getting ROTL is not a given. It is not automatic and there is no right to ROTL.
 It will always depend on an individual’s circumstances. Also, there is no guarantee that ROTL will start at the eligibil- ity date. It could be later on in the sentence.

The Restricted ROTL process (for people considered to be more dangerous) has been extended to cover anyone under Mappa. This process involves more checks (before ROTL is agreed and also when the ROTL is in place) and a psychological assessment. The decision is also taken at a higher level, as it must be signed off by a governor or deputy governor.

Who counts for restricted ROTL?

• All lifers, all IPPs;
• All eligible for Mappa;
• Anyone assessed as high risk or very high risk on OASys;
• Anyone who will be on the sex offenders register;
• Anyone who has a sentence for violence under schedule 15 of 12 months or more.

Everyone else will be assessed under the standard process.

Another important change is that not all prisons are allowed to provide restricted ROTL. It is now only available in open, category C/D and women’s prisons. This will impact on some people who are not yet classed as suitable for open but have been taking ROTLs in their prison. If you are in an open and closed site, you must be in the open part of the prison to be eligible for restricted ROTL.

If you are in a women’s prison, you must have been classed as suitable for open conditions to get restricted ROTL.
 

However, if you are assessed as low or medium risk under Mappa and already suitable for Cat D transfer, this can be priori- tised. Also your categorisation can be reviewed if you may be suitable for Cat D. This does not mean that you will be moved to Cat D automatically, but if you are in this situation, ask the prison staff if they can review your categorisation.

Another important change is that for anyone under the Restricted ROTL process, the first three ROTLs (at least) must be accompanied (taken with an officer).
 Please note that this is a minimum so it might be that you are assessed as needing more accompanied ROTLs.
There will be an additional licence condition requiring that you remain with and follow the instructions of the supervising officer at all times. Escorted absences for lifers and IPPs were suspended under the May 2014 interim instructions.
They have now been stopped but as all indeterminate sentence prisoners are under the restricted ROTL process, if they are approved for ROTL, they will have supervised ROTL on at least three occasions.

For lifers and IPPs, there is also a new guideline for when ROTL can be taken. To work this out, you will need to know the time period between your approval for transfer to open and your next provisional parole hearing date. This is a guideline though, so individual circumstances and the sentence plan will also be taken into account.
 

If you would like a copy of the new PSI on ROTL or have any questions, you can contact us at the Prison Reform Trust, FREEPOST ND6125 London EC1B 1PN. Our free information line is open Mondays 3.30-7.30 and Tuesday and Thursday 3.30-5.30. The number is 0808 802 0060 and does not need to be put on your pin.


http://insidetime.org/restricted-rotl/

letter from a Mother to Michael Gove - The Ipp situation being one of a matter of life and death!

 

Dear Michael Gove

Firstly i would like to thank you for taking the time to address my email.

I appreciate you are a busy man and it may be somewhat insignificant, however i really need you to personally read this, not another MP you personally, and i will keep sending this until i get some sort of personal response, for the sanity of myself and my children, for my partner who is at his wits end!

To me it is now in the situation of being a matter of life and death!

Whilst i am aware and appreciate you are in the process of addressing the current, yet abolished IPP sentence, i strongly and passionately believe it is impossible to do so without some in-depth first hand life experiences of families and prisoners alike serving this awful sentence.

I for one am completely in favour for punishment, as a mother of 3 and with elderly grandparents i am often left shocked beyond belief to the awful degrading crimes individuals commit against innocent people, and that prison first and foremost is the safest place in respect of the victims of these crimes and in many cases for the prisoner and general public, i am not blinded to dangerous offenders just because i am the partner of a man who indeed many years ago committed a serious crime.
However i am also a realist who after 9 years of being a big part of the prison environment have seen prison, in many cases is only a small part of the required punishment,
and being a partner of an IPP prisoner for almost 9 years has been the biggest insight into how the system has massively failed both victims and prisoners and their families alike.

It also goes without saying the damage this particular sentence is having on the prison system and staff also. I am confident you are all too aware of the situation, but undoubtable unless you have somebody close to you serving an IPP sentence it is very difficult to understand the impact on a personal level, which is why i have wrote to you to give you a bigger, more accurate flip of the coin so to speak,

I would like to begin with a little background information regarding my partner, i find it only fair to refer mainly to him as every individual has a different case, however the current need in my opinion is required in a vast majority of IPP cases.

My partner who i will …..name removed…….was given an IPP sentence in January 2008, of 2 years 256 days for a section 18 GBH with intent, he had previous for mainly minor offences, and had lived a life of somewhat disruption, devastation, abuse and neglect, and like many others turned to crime and anti-social behaviour in his teen years, abusing drugs, he served several very short sentences before receiving his IPP, in Jan 2008, addicted to cocaine and suffering major depression and wanting to end his life, he committed the offence as a massive cry for help, he wanted to be returned to prison for a lengthy sentence to get himself clean and safe from himself and the constant battle of life without any support or love, so much so, he even called the police on himself for which he was praised as they admitted if he hadnt he would never have been caught.

After his sentencing in jan 2008, he straight away engaged on all the courses required of him, RAPT PASRO CALM.. etc and completed all successfully, and got himself clean from drugs and remained a model prisoner, for well over 3 years was an enhanced prisoner, and in August 2011 after a successful parole hearing was given his category D status and moved to an open prison, things went good for him until he went to a children’s barbeque party, where alcohol was available for adults and he made the stupid mistake of having 2 or 3 cans of beer which addmittingly was not a part of his conditions, however that said, he did not consume drugs, did not resort to any violent behaviour, simply enjoyed a relaxed environment and fell into the normality he had been away from for over 3 years and meant no harm to anybody, however he realised this would have consequences and returned to his open estate an hour early of his curfew of 9pm and attmitted he had consumed 3 cans of beer and accepted he would suffer for it.

However this is where i feel the system has some of its biggest issues, staff seem to have no idea on a set protocol for licence breaches and instead of returning him to his room and losing his town leave for several weeks he was immediately returned to closed prison, having only been a first and minor breach.

im sure to yourself this may seem a little unfair that for this occurance alone it has cost him a further 4 plus years in prison at a cost of 40 thousand plus a year!
I am aware some prisoners do commit crimes on licence and in open conditions, but in this case i am sure other measures could have been taken?Sadly after discussing with many other IPP families this seems to be the case in many of there situations, their relative being recalled for a non criminal or violent minor breach.

This in my eyes is a major area that need addressing for not only prisoners and their families but for staff who also find the recall situation extremely unfair.
I myself have spoken with many officers over the years who find the system is flawed in this area and that many prisoners are being unfairly recalled. thus in return clogging up prisons with prisoners who could have been dealt with in another form.

Secondly i would like to give you an insight to the impact a recall has on everybody involved.
0nce again my partner had to come to terms with it being at least another 2 years before being given another chance of freedom, after initial shock we all came to terms with this and he engaged once again in courses and alcohol rehabilitation, even though probation said they did not see this as a requirement (despite returning him for consuming alcohol!) and in accordance to his offender manager within the prison he had completed all necessary work to be re- released at his next parole hearing.

However just one month prior to his hearing, despite recommendations from all to be returned to open conditions, he was assessed by a prison psychologist who had never met him or assessed him before who reported back he needed to do another course!
but with a month until his hearing, nobody recommending release felt the psychology assessment was deemed true enough to have his hearing postponed and it went ahead, however due to the psychology assessment alone he was denied open conditions.

This broke my partner, sent him on a downwards spiral, gave him no hope, made him feel all his rehabilitation work was useless to him, what once was rehabilitation measures now became institutionalisation, keeping him locked up purely for preventative measures, being recommended to do the SCP course by only one person, that the rest of his supervisors did not recommend, this left him emotionally unstable, having to do another 2 years, for me to have a breakdown, my children to suffer, causing nightmares, ill health in my young diabetic son who wanted to die because he still couldn’t play football with his dad still, i suffered from major anxiety, couldn’t sleep for months worrying he would take his own life, which he then started self-harming, the was no hope, no future for any of us.

We then proceeded in getting independent psychology reports done by 3 different psychologists, all of which confirmed he had no need to do the SCP and should be returned to open conditions, as did an IPDE assessment.

My partner on the advice of many professionals including his offender manager and probation officer and 3 psychologists declined to do the course and sat yet another parole hearing in October, despite all of this, he was yet again refused release on 4th November, my birthday, and 3 weeks after our best friend committed suicide, this was the final blow for us all, early this year, my partner started serious self harm, saw no future, no hope, told me to leave him, cried repeatedly, begged me to help him somehow, turned to spice for relief from his mental state, and several weeks ago was found in his cell, hanging, unconscious, had to be cut down by an officer and revived.

the devastation and reality of this sentence has broken an entire family, innocent children, their mother, a man who did his best to prove to the public he wanted to be trusted again, a man who did a charity marathon in prison, a man who talked many prisoners out of violent behaviour, a man who stopped numerous prisoners taking their own lives, who has assisted officers in dealing with hostile situations, a man who put himself in prison to correct his ways, a man who simply just wants another chance, to be a dad a husband, a law abiding citizen once more, the system wanted him to rehabilitate, he did, and for what?

To only be repeatedly punished for his offence.

I feel like there is so much more i can say, i also feel like i need to apologise for the long winded personal information i have divulged, but i wont apologise, i need to be heard, thousands of families stuck in the same situation need a voice, and i have done something i find very difficult to do and speak out for all of us, for the prisoners who have lost all hope, who watch their release goalposts being moved further away from them sometimes on a daily basis, for all the

IPP prisoners and their families, who have already taken their lives through having no hope,

no release date, for parents burying their children, for children burying their daddies, for children who have missed all their first days at school due to being severely over tariff.

They say if you can’t do the time don’t do the crime, but these men HAVE done their time, some 2- 3  AND 4 times over, many, through no fault of their own.

Surely its only fair with this sentence no longer existing it is unfair to treat them as if it still is, no man or woman nowadays can be subjected to this deemed inhumane system so its unfair they still are living this nightmare, we all are, no hope, no future, no plans, nothing, you sir have the power to make it stop, make it better make it easier, make it fair, make us equals, before the loss of life increases out of control.

These are my requests, and im sure are many others, and do not find them unreasonable requests.

 

1. Recall process is made clear and fair. Recall to be for offences that are reconvicted, or pose real risk to the public.

2. Prisoners who have done double their tariff and pose no PROVEN immediate risk to the public to be given determinate sentences released promptly and a shorter realistic licence period, for which would enable them to be around the much needed support of their loved ones.

3. Make available independent reports from psychologists not just prison based staff.

4. Ensure sentence plans are fair and achievable, and realistic to the individual, and cannot be changed simply on one person’s recommendation.

5. Make the IEP system fair.

6. Limit the amount of courses in sentence plans to avoid unrealistic goals and unavailability due to insufficient resources leaving some prisoners with no available rehabilitation work.

7. Actually make available immediately the resources for intense courses over a shorter period not courses lasting a year or more making progress unrealistic.

8. Make ROTL more family orientated as this is the ultimate support required to reduce reoffending.

9. Improve the bail hostel situation.

10. Provide better training for outside probation; make clear what can be done to avoid recalls.

11. Most importantly improve the support network for prisoners once released.

I appreciate you have the responsibility of the public to protect, but in all honesty, the public have a completely different view on this sentence than you are led to believe, after years of scaremongering people, namely the media, most of the public i have spoken to, and have taken part in surveys find this sentence inhumane and unfair, most in fact feel it has not been used as intended for serious offences such as child abuse, terrorism, serious cases of domestic violence, rapists, paedophiles etc... this is even the admission of David Blunkett.

I fully appreciate your stance on rehabilitation not punishment being the long term answer, however most if not all these men have already completed many courses, and are still not given the chance to put these into practice.
All we are asking is for change, to be heard, to be saved from a no longer existing LIFE sentence.
I have faith you can be the gentleman to bring hope to thousands affected deeply by this.

I wholeheartedly appreciate your time and patience to read this email/letter and will look forward to hopefully a detailed, open minded, helpful response

Much appreciation

Miss Kerry cove.

And on behalf of all IPP prisoners and their families

 

Heart felt letter from a Mother to Michael Gove To: michael.gove.mp@parliament.uk
Subject: IPP SENTENCES. 18 May 2016 04:02general.queries@justice.gsi.gov.uk