Danny Weatherston 'trapped'
10 years into a 13 month jail sentence Danny had to serve 13 months before
applying for parole - but under an Imprisonment for Public Protection sentence
he is still in jail a decade later
Danny
Weatherson
behind
bars for more than nine years, frustrated Danny Weatherson has attempted to
kill himself as he continues to fight for his release.
Danny was
just 18 when a judge recommended he served almost 16 months for two attempted
robberies before he could apply for parole - but almost a decade on, he still
has no release date.
ADVERTISING
His time
inside has been in high security prisons including HMP Northumberland, HMP
Moorlands in Doncaster, HMP Armley in Leeds, HMP Frankland in Durham and is now
in HMP Hull. And he has taken to self-harm to get him through his days.
But his
family says in February the Parole Board said Danny could be moved to a
category D open prison.
However,
just weeks later, he was told the prison that had been chosen was changed and
Danny slit his throat as his hopes were shattered.
His
solicitor, Shirley Noble, says he is being kept inside as he “poses a risk to
himself” and uses the self-harming mechanism to release the pain he suffers
emotionally.
He is now
being kept in a hospital wing were he can be continually monitored.
Now Danny’s
dad, Maurice Stevens, is hitting out at the system after his son was locked up
under the controversial Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) sentence which
came into force for England and Wales in 2005 but was axed in 2012.
It was
intended to protect the public against criminals whose crimes were not serious
enough to merit a normal life sentence but who were regarded as too dangerous
to be released when the term of their original sentence had expired.
Ministry
of Justice data shows the number of IPP prisoners still being held since the
sentences was abolished has reduced over the past year - from 4,756 on March 31
2015 to 4,133 on March 31 2016.
Danny
Weatherson
The
authorities admits the IPP sentence was widely criticised and “used far more
widely than intended”. And this is why it was replaced with a new regime of
tough, determinate sentences, alongside life sentences for the most serious
offenders.
Maurice,
44, of Lemington, Newcastle, says he has seen Danny’s mood deteriorate. “He has
nothing to live for,” said Maurice, a builder, who will next visit him on July
18 when he celebrates his 28th birthday.
“He cut
his throat with a razor about seven or eight times, I don’t know what he will
do next.”
Justice
secretary Michael Gove has ordered a review of the position of thousands of
prisoners serving an IPP sentence. Many are considered to be languishing inside
because they are several years over the minimum sentence they were given.
Danny, of Scotswood, Newcastle, who had been in
trouble for a string on minor crimes before being jailed, is among those who
feels they have been left to rot behind bars.
Dad-of-two
Maurice added: “He has been knocked back about five times by the Parole Board
but in February they all said he would be eligible for a category D open
prison. But a week or two later inside probation said he wasn’t suitable. She
had only met him twice and she doesn’t know him to make a decision like this.
“In late
March he slit his throat with a razor blade, he’s got the scars. You can tell
he is hurting inside. These IPP sentences mean he has no target date to get out
and he is going year after year and getting nowhere. He is sick of his life,
you can tell in his eyes he has nothing to live for.
“There
are thousands of people stuck in the system on these IPPs and they are
languishing in jail. The probation and the parole boards don’t know what to do
with them. They were abolished in 2012 but still Danny and so many others are
stuck in prison.”
Mr Gove
has asked chairman of the parole board Nick Hardwick to review how IPP
prisoners are treated.
While the
justice secretary has said that dangerous offenders must be kept inside, he
says he wants the majority of IPP prisoners to be “given hope and a reason to
engage in rehabilitative activity”. He wants to see the prison population
reduced.
Maurice Stevens
Danny’s
solicitor Shirley Noble, of Northumberland based Alderson Law Solicitors, said:
“In summary, it is fair to say that Danny had a minimum term of one year, three
months and 26 days imposed upon him on February 16, 2007, and his tariff
expired on the April 13, 2008.
“Danny
has progressed well during his sentence although he has had the odd ‘blip’,
some of which is understandable in what is an artificial environment. He has
completed all of the core risk reduction work which has been recommended for
him as part of his sentence plan and has demonstrated that he has good
interpersonal skills. In fact Danny could be described as an articulate,
intelligent man.
“I
personally believe that as a result of the time he has been incarcerated along
with the frustration of not having an end date to his sentence, he has lost his
identity. He appeared before the Parole Board in February 2016 when the panel
recommended a progressive move to open conditions. This obviously gave Danny
some hope that there was light at the end of the tunnel. However due to an
adverse development which was subsequently resolved the prison made contact
with the Public Protection Casework Section (PPCS) to revoke the
recommendation. He self-harmed severely as a means of coping with the disappointment.
The prison now say he should not progress to open, he is still a risk, however
he is a risk of harm to himself as opposed to the public. This is a method he
uses to deal with stress and anxiety and a belief he is being let down. Keeping
him incarcerated will only exacerbate this and in the meantime he becomes more
institutionalised, treading water so to speak and trying to be normal in an
abnormal environment with no light at the end of the tunnel. A prison
environment is unlikely to be able to manage the self-harm issues effectively,
whilst he does have constructive positive engagement with mental health but the
prison is there to help him rehabilitate, which he has strived to do.
A
Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: “The number of IPP prisoners has reduced
over the past year.
“However,
we recognise there are problems in the system, so the justice secretary has
asked the chairman of the Parole Board to develop an improved approach to the
parole system for these offenders.
“We
continue to prioritise IPP prisoners for places on courses and provide other
interventions to help them reduce their risk and progress towards release.”
No comments:
Post a Comment
comment
Note: only a member of this blog may post a comment.